Seestar and Equinox1 for EAA
https://www.cloudynights.com/topic/916071-seestar-and-equinox1-for-eaa/ The Seestar is better at nebulae, perhaps because the built in filter does its job.
The Seestar is also better with open clusters, largely because stars become quickly bloated with the Equinox.
With galaxies I am not so sure.
I suspect the larger aperture of the Equinox would give it an advantage in a head to head contest,
but I was not dissatisfied with the results produced by the Seestar in the ideal conditions.
Yet there is one serious disadvantage with the Seestar.
In the absence of wind the Equinox rarely misses a frame when stacking whereas the Seestar is plagued with missed frames.
This is no doubt frustrating for astrophotographers,
but for EAA it is almost a fatal flaw. Minutes can go by with little or no development.