spacer.png, 0 kB
首頁 arrow 觀星論壇 arrow 觀星工具 arrow 砲管集中營 arrow 拍彗星該一張多少 ?
拍彗星該一張多少 ?
2024-04-19 03:40:12 *
歡迎光臨, 訪客. 請先 登入註冊一個帳號.
您忘了 啟用您的帳號嗎?

請輸入帳號, 密碼以及預計登入時間
新聞:
 
   首頁   說明 登入 註冊  
頁: [1]
  列印  
作者 主題: 拍彗星該一張多少 ?  (閱讀 3623 次)
peter
正式會員
星系團
******
文章: 47822



« 於: 2017-04-05 13:24:50 »

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1586866471326904&set=a.269535393060025.83092.100000107007390&type=3&theater
 





 BY
Fritz Helmut Hemmerich

Comet 2017 E4 Lovejoy from this morning. During only half an hour the morphological changes in the tail are enormous. I was very happy the capture the evolution of a disruption event finally visible in the right most image. Each of these 12 images are a stack of 5 subframes with a total exposure time of 150 sec each. The most important for me is to realize, what happens, when you use total exposure times of 10 or 20 or 30 minutes and stack these subframes. There is a smear effect resulting in 'impressiv' tails which are totally fake as you can see in the bottom image which is a stack of 30 min exposure time. (If you would stack 10 pictures of a jumping person, you would not be able to recognize the person but instead you'ld get a smeared tall something). I myself made this mistake in the past and I saw the same artificial tails in the images of some well known comet photographers in the past days. I think we have to rethink our imaging techniques in regard of the total exposure time at least in the case of comets with such a fast changing morphology. Please follow this link to see the details more clearly from one 2 1/2 minute step to the next one (you'll need use zoom to detect the differences: https://www.flickr.com/photos/fhhemmerich/33682359082/in/dateposted-public/lightbox/
Technique: 12 x 5 x 30 sec. Hyperstar 14" F1.9. Sony A7s (CentralDS), ISO 3200, UV/IR cut filter. FOV 1.7° (horizontal). 2017-04-04 6:26h - 6:56h UT, Tenerife 1180 m altitude.

===

感謝分享

已記錄

請連署支持翠峰天文科技觀星園區

http://campaign.tw-npo.org/campaign//sign.php?id=2009113019034900
peter
正式會員
星系團
******
文章: 47822



« 回覆文章 #1 於: 2017-04-05 13:27:56 »

彗星的處理方式顯然跟一般DSO不同

因為彗尾其實會變的

疊彗星需要case by case
彗星相對於天球的移動量,決定彗尾的清晰度...

已記錄

請連署支持翠峰天文科技觀星園區

http://campaign.tw-npo.org/campaign//sign.php?id=2009113019034900
頁: [1]
  列印  
 
前往:  

重要聲明:本論壇是以即時上載留言的方式運作,論壇對所有留言的真實性、完整性及立場等,不負任何法律責任。而一切留言之言論只代表留言者個人意見,並非本會之立場,用戶不應信賴內容,並應自行判斷內容之真實性。於有關情形下,用戶應尋求專業意見。由於本論壇受到「即時上載留言」運作方式所規限,故不能完全監察所有留言,若讀者發現有留言出現問題,請聯絡我們。觀星論壇有權刪除任何留言及拒絕任何人士上載留言,同時亦有不刪除留言的權利。切勿撰寫粗言穢語、誹謗、渲染色情暴力或人身攻擊的言論,敬請自律。本網站保留一切法律權利。
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.17 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
spacer.png, 0 kB